Misguided War - When Civilians Are Caught In The Crossfire
What I have yet to see disputed is that the children who may or may not have died in Qana while they were sleeping in what they and their mothers thought was a safe house, were killed from some form of an Israeli attack, and surely a missile.
There is an acceptance by so many that the children were in the wrong place and time. Ain't that the truth! However, there are many who would squarely point the finger of blame, not at those that killed them, but at those that brought on the attacks that killed them.
By this reasoning, I can only assume that the Israelis are not capable of restraint. Their's is a reflex reaction - when they are provoked, they attack back. Consequently, any harm that comes to those that provoke Israel is all on the provokers, not on Israel.
So, nevermind that woman and children might be killed in the process. They are casualties of war.
Recall the Beslan catastrophe, when Russian forces stormed the school with tanks and heavy weaponry? The result was chaos and 344 civilians were killed, including 186 children. I know most Americans were rightfully horrified at the huge loss of life during the rescue, and would never have accepted that kind of outcome were the hostage crises on U.S. soil.
The same should hold true everywhere. If Hezbollah is mingling with populations of woman and children, that has to be taken into account, it cannot be dismissed. There are ways to win a war, ways to execute a battle, but they should not include putting civilians in danger, even if that's what the "other side" is suspected of doing.
And this is what is causing the public opinion backlash against Israel. At the very least, they have allowed themselves to be lured into the type of war Hezbollah wants to wage, and by taking the bait, they fall to the level of the foes they would want the world to demonize as terrorists. They become partners in terror to the innocent civilians caught in the crossfire. Those that feed the beast are equally branded as demons.
And what of the vaunted precision guided missile system the Israelis are using? You know, the ones we sold to them. Is it a case of operator error when we hear report after report of mistaken hits on civilian homes, Red Cross vans, or U.N. observation posts? If so, it would seem that we need to get them some better training in the future to avoid such inconveniences. Too many such snafus can get embarrassing.
Is it the anonymity of a long distance strike that enables people to obscure the horror of the result? Is that an adequate enough defense that "shit happens" in war?
How is it different than lining up the civilians, the woman, the children, and shooting them at point blank range? Does the blind bomb make it alright?
If it does, then isn't that an admission that the precision guided missile isn't as precise as we claim it to be, and therefore when such weapons are used, they have the same result as the less precise missiles Hezbollah has also been accused of using?
What we're left with is yet another war with no winners, only losers. Israel's gambit that they could pound Hezbollah into submission isn't working, and the casualties have escalated to the point the whole world is watching for every new Israeli misstep. The powder keg that is the Middle East is poised to erupt if hostilities are not ended swiftly and completely. Otherwise Israel could find itself wishing it had responded to a kidnapping, let's say, "differently".
Just as Israel and its supporters will say Hezbollah is getting what it had coming, Israel has also fermented the seeds of international discontent against it. Even those that would not support Hezbollah's actions cannot condone the escalation of confrontation. Israel, as a democratic nation has the most to lose from this miscalculation, and will have played into Hezbollah's hands. They need an exit strategy that allows them to save face - but the big question is whether there is any opportunity for that now.
Cross-posted at World View.

4 Comment(s):
You say "There are ways to win a war, ways to execute a battle, but they should not include putting civilians in danger, even if that's what the "other side" is suspected of doing."
Hezbollah uses civilians as human shields for their rocket positions; how would YOU stop the rocket attacks, general? I'm still waiting for you to enlighten us about your better idea. What is your secret plan, or can you only criticize Israel? TR had you pegged pretty well.
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.”
Theodore Roosevelt
You say "At the very least, they have allowed themselves to be lured into the type of war Hezbollah wants to wage, and by taking the bait, they fall to the level of the foes they would want the world to demonize as terrorists. They become partners in terror to the innocent civilians caught in the crossfire. Those that feed the beast are equally branded as demons."
This is your best idea yet; since Hezbollah wants Israel to attack, Israel should do nothing. Maybe after Hezbollah has fifty thousand rockets Hezbollah will suddenly decide to drop their idea about destroying Israel. A truly brilliant piece of strategy.
It's clear that you have no idea of how to actually get rid of the rockets so where do you get off giving the IDF advice? Try reading some TR instead of Cindy Sheehan.
As someone who pretends to offer sensible points of view in a military/security sense....you don't offer much americafirst. It makes no sense whatsoever to strengthen an entrenched militia by harassing the general popoulation into looking upon that militia as saviors and heroes. That's the mistake the Brits made here in the American colonies. It is unsound to take any measure that increases the strength of your enemy, which is what the IDF is currently doing. You keep talking about this Israeli campaign as if it were actually working.....it's not. It is strengthening Hezbollah and may even serve as a tool for converting more Sunnis over to Shia Islam. Mistake! Shia is the very brand of Islam that we in the West would NOT like to see win out in the Middle East.
You keep wanting to pretend that this ass-kicking is beneficial to the security of Israel, it isn't. What Israel should have done when their guys were kidnapped was to figure out where they were and then stage a rescue operation for those two guys, they've proven many times that they are capable of that kind of operation. As it is, I have no doubt that Hezbollah has already placed the poor guys right in one of the houses that they've shot their rockets from specifically so that the two guys will be blown away by their own military. This is the kind of guerilla tactic you could expect from someone like Hezbollah. They make up for a lack of firepower through more personal, more close-in, more vicious tactics.
The only way enhance the security of Israel at this point is to make the Lebanese people and other Arabs stop looking upon Hezbollah as their defenders. Unfortunately, Israel is making Hezbollah more popular for every day of attacks that they perpetrate on southern Lebanon. That is a major strategic mistake on the part of the IDF.
Over to you MacArthur....oh wait, I take that back, MacArthur actually was pragmatic....uhhh over to you Custer.
Tony Blair talks about the kind of war that needs to be waged.
quote:
"The Prime Minister said: "There is an arc of extremism now stretching across the Middle East and touching countries far outside that region."
Mr Blair spoke of how he believed "global extremism" should be tackled.
"To defeat it will need an alliance of moderation that paints a different future in which Muslim, Jew and Christian, Arab and Western, wealthy and developing nations can make progress in peace and harmony.
"We will not win the battle against this global extremism unless we win it at the level of values as much as force, unless we show we are even-handed, fair and just in our application of those values to the world."
He said this "unconventional" war must be won through these values.
"This war can't be won in a conventional way, it can only be won by showing that our values are stronger, better and more just, more fair than the alternatives," he said.
He said it was a part of struggle between what he called reactionary Islam and moderate mainstream Islam.
:endquote
Blair grows a brain!
Post a Comment
All comments are welcome, however, rather than posting an Anonymous comment please consider selecting Other and providing your name or nickname so others know who you are. Thanks.
Links to this post:
Create a Link