What is Reichert Hiding?

Back in July I took a look at the Quality of Disclosure numbers at OpenSecrets.org. Back then OpenSecrets.org reported Burner at 100% full disclosure, with Reichert lagging badly at only 82%, with almost $106,898 of itemized contributions lacking any information about the donor's employer and/or occupation, and $8,199 more in itemized contributions with incomplete or vague information.

Today these numbers have not improved for Reichert, who has dropped to 81% full disclosure, with $160,108 of itemized contributions lacking any information about the donor's employer and/or occupation, and $53,399 more in itemized contributions with incomplete or vague information. Burner is at 99%.

Here's the complete list as reported at OpenSecrets.org:

%Full Disclosure/Race - Candidate

100% 03 - Brian Baird (D) *
100% 07 - Steve Beren (R)
100% Sen - Aaron L. Dixon (G)
100% Sen - Bruce Guthrie (L)
100% 01 - Larry Ishmael (R)
100% 03 - Michael Henry Messmore (R)
100% 07 - Linnea S. Noreen (I)
100% 04 - Claude Lloyd Oliver (R)
100% 04 - Richard Wright (D)
99% 08 - Darcy Burner (D)
99% 05 - Peter Goldmark (D)
99% 05 - Cathy McMorris (R) *
98% 09 - Steven Cofchin (R)
98% 06 - Norm Dicks (D) *
98% 04 - Doc Hastings (R) *
98% 01 - Jay Inslee (D) *
96% 02 - Rick Larsen (D) *
96% 07 - Jim McDermott (D) *
95% Sen - Maria Cantwell (D) *
95% Sen - Michael McGavick (R)
94% 02 - Douglas Robert Roulstone (R)
94% 09 - Adam Smith (D) *
81% 08 - Dave Reichert (R) *

* indicates incumbent

Reichert's numbers are ridiculously low compared to every other candidate.

Makes you wonder why.